EB-2 NIW Case Study: Surgeon From Nigeria Approval in 6 Months and 21 Days, No RFE

When this case first reached Senior Attorney Vivian Daher, it presented a challenge of merging two fields into one. “The client had such a strong profile,” Attorney Daher stated. “But the challenge was translating what he wanted to do into something that truly reflected its broader impact. We had to define how his work with AI and cardiovascular medicine could benefit the United States as a whole.” 

Balancing two complex disciplines under the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) category was a unique opportunity. As Attorney Daher shared, “This was the very first case where I was able to combine both fields. We had not just a doctor in the STEM field of science, but also in technology. That made the case much stronger.”  

Attorney Daher built the case on a clear framework that showed both national reach and measurable health impact. “There is no one-size-fits-all strategy,” she said. “All elements of the case including evidence, statements, and documentation, must demonstrate consistency and strategic alignment to reinforce the petition’s credibility and clarity.”  

As an independent contractor, the client had wide influence across hospitals, research institutions, and medical collaborations. Attorney Daher identified specific U.S. partners such as academic centers, cardiology groups, and trauma programs, while encouraging letters of interest to prove early traction. Every element of the endeavor, from AI-driven diagnostics to risk prediction and patient monitoring, was anchored in real clinical applications, which made the science practical and credible. 

She also highlighted the feasibility and structure of the client’s endeavor. The filing included a detailed services and pricing plan, regulatory and ethical guidance, clinician training, and pilot milestones that showed how the work could sustain itself independently. Attorney Daher organized the record to align education, licensure, leadership experience, publications, and expert evaluations under one consistent narrative. She emphasized collaboration with the client to maintain accuracy and completeness. “When the initial filing is comprehensive and well-structured, it greatly reduces the likelihood of additional requests for evidence,” she explained. 

The petition was approved under premium processing, validating the strength and clarity of the case from the very first review. With Attorney Daher and our legal team’s careful planning, our client’s vision to integrate AI into cardiovascular medicine was recognized as a matter of national importance. The petition was a complete narrative of purpose, skill, and measurable public benefit, leaving no gaps for uncertainty.  

“When we file a complete and well-organized case from the start, it speaks for itself,” she said. This success affirmed our client’s qualifications and demonstrated our team’s ability to merge science and strategy to deliver results. 

This case succeeded because every exhibit, credential, and letter supported the same message: that the client’s work would directly advance U.S. healthcare through innovation in cardiovascular medicine. As Attorney Daher reiterated, “We make sure the endeavor, the evidence, and the impact are connected. That’s how a strong case wins.” 

Another decisive factor was strategy. By structuring the endeavor under an independent contractor model, Attorney Daher showed our client’s ability to impact multiple hospitals, research institutions, and patient populations across the country. The plan included tangible deliverables such as AI-driven diagnostics, clinical training programs, and ethical implementation frameworks, demonstrating both feasibility and reach. 

Finally, consistency made a difference. Education, licensing, leadership experience, and expert opinions were woven into one logical, evidence-based record.